In my article, Our Social Atmosphere and The Inception of COVID “Vaccines,” I delved into the social environment of fear created around SARS-CoV-2 as well as death rates, and treatment. Now that vaccine mandates have been introduced around the world, it’s important to look at some of the reasons that can cause COVID-19 “vaccine” hesitancy. Previous posts dealt with vaccine safety, medical ethics, emergency use authorization, big pharma, mandates, incentives, and Fauci. Now let’s explore COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
Vaccines
Before going into vaccine effectiveness, it’s important to learn some of the basics of vaccine development and the difference between typical vaccines and COVID-19 shots / mRNA “vaccines” in order to have a point of comparison. The typical vaccine development process takes between 8 to 15 years. This is the first time in history that a “vaccine” is given to millions of people without going through proper research procedures, even though mRNA technology hasn’t been successful before.
Every media outlet and government entity tells us that COVID-19 shots are safe and that most vaccines are good for us. Simultaneously, the pharmaceutical companies tell us that these vaccines are “highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19.” Let’s look into Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to examine COVID-19 shots’ effectiveness.
Pfizer “Vaccine”
Based on the information on Pfizer’s clinical trials, we can evaluate their claims about the effectiveness of the Pfizer shot. By looking at pharma’s methodology and assertions, it is evident that there are numerous problems with the data produced from these clinical trials:
? Pfizer and the FDA claimed that there was “no concrete measurement of serious adverse events in participants.” However, Pfizer was ordered by the courts to submit in-depth reports and the Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Report shows the following:
- 1,223 participants died within three months of the clinical trials
- 11,361 experienced adverse reactions from which they haven’t recovered
- 520 recovered with sequela
- 19,582 are still recovering
? Pfizer and BioNTech didn’t have an objective entity or the FDA to verify the integrity of the data or the study.
? Clinical trials offered no environmental controls – no pre-screening for antibodies or PCR testing.
? Pfizer eliminated the placebo group and unblinded the subjects.
? The results reported that the chances of COVID infection were very similar for a group receiving the biologic and the one that originally didn’t receive the shot.
? The data of 9,400 enrolled participants were missing.
Learn in-depth information about the efficacy and safety profile of the Pfizer “vaccine,” their clinical trials, and more.
Moderna “Vaccine”
Moderna is another major manufacturer of COVID-19 “vaccines” and its product is mRNA-1273. Based on the documents sent to the FDA, Moderna’s shot doesn’t show to be very effective or safe, according to experts.
? There were different formulations of the mRNA-1273 in the document
? There were approximately 400 pages of irrelevant content, not related to mRNA-1273 in the 699-page document sent to the FDA for approval
? The document provided to the FDA lacks specific details (mRNA ”payload”) about the formulation of their COVID-19 shot
? There was only one toxicology study of mRNA-1273 that lived up to good laboratory practice (GLP)
? Nevertheless, Moderna cited studies showing a significant risk of vaccine-induced antibody-dependent enhancement, Moderna and the FDA reported that mRNA-1273 didn’t present any safety issues.
? The FDA and Moderna lied about reproductive toxicology issues related to mRNA-1273
? Conflict of interest exists between Moderna and NIH / NIAID
Learn in-depth information about the efficacy and safety profile of the Moderna “vaccine,” their clinical trials, and more.
These companies can’t declare high efficacy because many clinical trials didn’t test it and the data doesn’t show it. The clinical trials only addressed symptom reduction. There wasn’t any real methodology or data addressing infection or transmission. Conclusions about transmission or infection of SARS-CoV-2 can’t be drawn because those variables weren’t tested. To infer and claim that COVID-19 “vaccines” prevent COVID-19 effectively is fraudulent.
Furthermore, the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published a piece concluding that “real-world studies” in early 2021 overinflated vaccine effectiveness. The authors pointed out that case counting started 14 days post-vaccination so those who got infected within 14 days were counted as unvaccinated, nullifying cases in vaccinated groups. There were also age biases since vaccination rates were higher in older and less healthy individuals but randomization in trials is needed to ensure identical age distributions in vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Lastly, information related.to previous infection wasn’t accounted for. Therefore, lower infection rates could have been the result of previous infection and natural immunity.
What Does Non-Pharma Sponsored Research Say?
Reading the published data from pharmaceutical companies or the FDA doesn’t give the full picture related to the effectiveness of these COVID-19 shots. Getting all your data from companies that develop the products they promote is problematic since it’s not objective, which is why it’s necessary to read studies from scientists with no conflicts of interest. It’s important to read research from different sources, not pharma-sponsored research.
Currently, we have numerous studies on vaccine efficacy disputing pharmaceutical companies’ claims about the shot’s effectiveness ⤵️
- There is no significant difference in the PCR results of “vaccinated and unvaccinated, or asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta”.
- When comparing vaccine breakthrough infections (people getting the virus post-vaccination) to the unvaccinated, there was no significant difference in viral loads. However, those vaccinated “frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses.”
- There is a 40% increased risk of covid infection in the first two weeks among the elder vaccinated at home care facilities.
- There is a 48% increased rate of infection in the first 9 days after vaccination vs. the unvaccinated.
- There is a 400% increase in symptomatic covid from before vaccination to the day of vaccination, in those hospitalized.
- There is a 69% higher rate of covid in vaccinated healthcare workers compared to the unvaccinated in the first 13 days after vaccination.
- There is virtually zero vaccine effectiveness for participants from 0 to 13 days after the first dose
- Studies show that vaccination can enhance the rise of virulent pathogens.
Additionally, studying 68 countries and 2,947 American counties showed that locations with high rates of vaccinated people have higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection. “Countries with over 75% of their population fully vaccinated (such as Israel) have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
The top 3 counties in the US [Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico)] with the highest “percentage of fully vaccinated people (99.9–84.3%) are high transmission counties. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as low transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% have only vaccinated percentage less than 20% of the population.”
At the same time, numerous studies show that natural immunity confers longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease, and hospitalization caused by SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.
CDC Data
Furthermore, Dr.Henry Ealy compiled information from the CDC and found the vaccine failure rate. This is vaccine ineffectiveness or vaccine failure to prevent infection, which now is being called “vaccine breakthrough data.” This is what he found up to June 2022:
- Almost 12 Million vaccine breakthrough cases were confirmed even without the reports from 9 states
- Over 276,000 new vaccine breakthrough hospitalizations were confirmed
- Between 2/2022 and 6/2022, there were over 59,000 new vaccine breakthrough deaths (deaths of the vaccinated who got COVID-19) even after 12 states stopped reporting
Are You Hesitant to Get COVID-19 “Vaccines”?
If you are hesitant to take the COVID-19 “vaccine,” you have the right to be. Based on the evidence related to Pfizer and Moderna shots, I would have to disagree with the proclamation that COVID-19 “vaccines” are effective. Plus, data shows that naturally acquired immunity confers stronger protection against infection and symptomatic disease than vaccine-indued immunity.
Even without looking at the data, you can look around. Most people you know and those pushing for mass vaccination (Fauci, Biden, Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, AOC, Sanjay Gupta, Pfizer CEO, etc.), got the virus repeatedly. Not only that but Pfizer executives admitted that these “vaccines” were not tested to stop transmission of the virus.
The only claim that pharmaceutical companies can make at this point is that receiving the experimental shot can lower symptom severity in SOME individuals when contracting SARS-CoV-2.
Yet, the effectiveness issue shouldn’t even be addressed since the overall risk of a fatal outcome from Covid-19 is about 1% and hospitalization is 3.6% according to Physicians for Informed Consent. Since there are other efficacious treatment options available and these shots are creating fatal and numerous adverse reactions, why do these experimental gene modification shots keep being pushed to market?
Could it be because our public officials and health authorities aren’t concerned about the collateral damage of mass vaccination (check out Dr. Fauci’s conversation with Zuckerberg, Facebook’s Founder)? Or is it because our policy members have financial entanglements with Big Pharma and the end result of Covid policies is power and control?
To a Fitter Healthier You,
The Fitness Wellness Mentor
